When public officials take on the mantle of leadership, much is expected from them—wise decisions, quick responses to crises, and steady oversight of local governance.
But beyond the policies and speeches lies a crucial element that often escapes public scrutiny: the health of the leader.
Recent news about Iloilo City Mayor Jerry Treñas’ series of health challenges, including sinus surgery, diabetes management, and previous hospitalizations, raises an essential point. While the mayor assures that his health remains stable, his well-being serves as a reminder of how the physical and mental fitness of leaders directly impact governance.
A leader’s health is more than just a personal matter; it is a public concern. For example, when a leader is sidelined due to illness or is operating under less-than-ideal physical conditions, governance suffers. Decisions may be delayed, crises mismanaged, and the overall stability of public institutions placed at risk.
Treñas’ situation is not unique—leaders all over the world have faced health-related challenges that have had a direct effect on their ability to lead.
History is replete with examples where a leader’s health, or lack thereof, played a significant role in governance. In the Philippines, former President Ferdinand Marcos Sr.’s deteriorating health in the early 1980s, exacerbated by complications from lupus, is often cited as a factor in the country’s political and economic instability during that period.
Marcos’ inability to effectively govern due to his illness created a power vacuum, leading to a series of events that eventually culminated in the People Power Revolution.
Globally, we also saw the effects of health on leadership when former U.S. President Woodrow Wilson suffered a stroke in 1919, leaving him incapacitated for the remainder of his term. His wife, Edith Wilson, became an unofficial steward of his presidency, making executive decisions on his behalf. This raised ethical and governance questions about the transparency of leadership.
Leadership is an unrelenting responsibility that demands peak mental acuity and physical vigor. While illness is a natural part of life, it is essential for leaders to maintain their health for the sake of effective governance. The ability to make sound, well-informed decisions, particularly in times of crisis, often depends on the leader’s fitness.
In Mayor Treñas’ case, his commitment to monitoring his health and his transparency regarding his medical condition offer reassurance to the public. Yet, it also underscores the importance of consistent wellness not just for political campaigns but for daily governance.
Good governance is as much about the health of the leader as it is about the health of the city or nation they lead. When leaders prioritize their well-being, they send a clear message—they are not just fit to lead, but fit to serve the public with the energy, wisdom, and focus that the position demands.
May this serve as a reminder to all public officials that governance is not just a matter of the mind but of the body as well.
