By Modesto P. Sa-onoy
I quoted yesterday, WHO representative Abeyasinghe who said he recognized the urgency to find something “without that proof” and we are “creating is a false confidence that if people take Ivermectin, they’re going to be protected and that could actually be harmful.”
Were all the vaccines WHO is advocating tested on humans prior to getting into the market or are they just now being tested on humans?
Is this not the same with the vaccine – creating without proof and false confidence since the manufacturers and our government say these vaccines do not provide immunity or protection? In fact, the manufacturers are not so certain of their product that they demand no indemnity for any adverse effect. So why are WHO and DOH pushing for them? Is it because these are theirs?
Abeyansinghe and his cabal’s problem is that they refuse to accept the proof on the efficacy of Ivermectin. Thousands of proofs had been published since last year (I cited many of them) but as Christ said, “they have eyes but do not see and ears but do not hear.” In fact, if we demand the same standards that WHO, FDA and DOH insist for Ivermectin their vaccine should not go into the market because they had not been tested on humans and in fact are just now using the millions of those being vaccinated as guinea pigs.
One Filipino doctor in Florida for instance had been treating thousands of patients with Ivermectin without any adverse results. I’ll present her statement later. There are also testimonies in the US Congress on the effectiveness of Ivermectin. But WHO and company refuse to listen.
In fact, Dr. Pierre Kory whose works and articles I cited extensively, testified in our Congress but his testimony was not reported by Philippine media. I learned about this only obliquely. That is expected because mainstream media and even professional journals refuse to publish the articles of researchers and doctors on their effective use of Ivermectin. The “conspiracy theory” about the pandemic is not a theory, as even here one can readily see.
Surely WHO and its collaborators in the Philippines know how to read, except that reading refuses to believe because Ivermectin will scuttle their global agenda of controlling humans.
Despite advising against its use, it remains whether the FDA would impose its will now that their position has been exposed and rebutted. What they do is threaten those who compound Ivermectin like Dr. Allan Landrito and doctors who are prescribing it.
Indeed, the selective policy of FDA and DOH is apparent. Until now, they had not investigated the reported illegal vaccination of personnel of the Presidential Security Group in 2020 with smuggled Sinopharm. We need a good explanation from these so-called health experts. They slammed their mouths shut after President Rodrigo Duterte excused the illegal vaccination and Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana said that it was justified.
The FDA and DOH rules are clearly incomprehensible except to suspect that they are making policies to advance and protect the interest of the Big Pharma. For what advantage to them?
Indeed, Philippine Star noted, as we also had for months, that doctors and researchers around the world have been using off-label drugs, like Ivermectin or those meant for other illnesses to treat COVID-19 patients.
On March 20, Philstar reported the discussions in the House of Representatives on the use of Ivermectin. I had already cited some portions of the discussions.
In that meeting, Rep. Helen Tan (Quezon 4th District), chairperson of the House Committee on Health panel said that a hearing set for March 23 is intended “to investigate the decision of FDA to prevent the use of Ivermectin despite its potential and promise as a drug treatment for virus in other countries. We want to know what causes the skyrocketing spike in cases, we want to know the status of the government’s contact tracing efforts, and we want to know what treatments are available out there so we can save as many patients as possible from this deadly disease.” Tan is a medical doctor.
The hearing was therefore loaded, a great opportunity for the vaccine pushers to snowball and engage in diversionary tactics.
Continued tomorrow.
