Commission on Elections (COMELEC) Chairperson George Garcia is both giving hope and inviting controversy as he announced new strategies aimed at curbing early campaigning and regulating social media use in election campaigns.
These efforts are vital to modernizing the Philippines’ electoral processes, which are currently constrained by outdated laws and persistent legal loopholes that some politicians exploit to gain undue advantages.
The initiative to consider candidates as official from the time they declare their candidacy could fundamentally change the electoral landscape by limiting the use of public resources for personal campaign gains. This is particularly important in a political climate where incumbents often use government programs and activities to bolster their visibility and likability among constituents, effectively turning state-funded initiatives into campaign platforms.
Programs such as the Aid In Crisis Situations (AICS) and Tulong Pang-hanapbuhay sa Ating Disadvantaged/Displaced Workers (TUPAD) are notable examples where public resources can potentially be misused for political gains, as discussed by Chairperson Garcia.
However, this proposed change faces significant legal hurdles, notably the Supreme Court’s 2009 Penera vs. COMELEC decision, which restricts the prosecution of election offenses to the official campaign period.
Garcia’s acknowledgment of this decision, alongside his commitment to circumvent it legally, underscores a proactive approach by COMELEC to adapt to evolving political strategies and technologies that can influence voter behavior outside the traditional campaign period.
This challenge is compounded by the explosive growth and influence of social media in political campaigns, a realm not comprehensively regulated by current electoral laws.
The Fair Election Act, for instance, addresses only traditional media, leaving a vast digital landscape relatively unchecked.
COMELEC’s plan to legislate social media activities during elections is an essential step towards ensuring fairness, preventing misinformation, and protecting the integrity of the electoral process.
The call for public engagement in these efforts is not just necessary but imperative. The Filipino electorate must be vigilant and participative in ensuring that these new regulations are implemented effectively. It is only through collective effort and public scrutiny that the desired reforms in the electoral process can be achieved and maintained.
Moreover, the upcoming National and Local Elections (NLE) in 2025 will be a significant test of these initiatives.
With a new election systems provider and substantial changes in the transmission and tabulation of election results, ensuring transparency and accuracy is more crucial than ever.
The elimination of the centralized transparency server and the spread of results directly from precincts to multiple entities is a promising approach to enhance trust and verify authenticity in the electoral outcomes.
As we move closer to another electoral cycle, it is imperative for all stakeholders, from government agencies to the voting public and civil society organizations, to support COMELEC in these reformative efforts.
Strengthening our election laws and closing loopholes not only serves to level the playing field but also protects the democratic process itself, ensuring that every Filipino’s vote counts and is counted correctly.
