The push for the creation of the Negros Island Region (NIR) is once again under threat as a petition filed before the Supreme Court seeks to challenge the legality of its establishment. While supporters of the NIR see it as a necessary administrative restructuring to improve government efficiency in Negros Occidental, Negros Oriental, and Siquijor, dissenters argue that the region’s creation lacked public consultation and bypassed a plebiscite.
At the heart of this debate is the urgency felt by many Negros residents, who have long advocated for an administrative region that will centralize services, reduce bureaucratic delays, and allow for more streamlined governance. Both Negros Occidental Governor Eugenio Jose Lacson and 5th District Rep. Dino Yulo have emphasized the importance of the NIR in enhancing service delivery and reducing the hurdles in addressing the unique needs of the island provinces.
However, while the region’s creation has garnered overwhelming support from local lawmakers and citizens, the Supreme Court petition highlights concerns from a group led by Rev. Fr. Hendrix Alar, who argue that the establishment of the NIR was done without adequate public consultation. Their demand for a plebiscite, though not a constitutional requirement for the formation of an administrative region, underscores the need for transparency and inclusivity in any major government initiative.
Proponents of the NIR are confident that the process followed in passing Republic Act No. 12000 was legal and sufficient. Rep. Mercedes Alvarez of Negros Occidental’s 6th District defended the law, stating that it merely reorganizes governance and does not establish a new political entity that would require a plebiscite. Still, they acknowledged that the petitioners are exercising their right to legal recourse.
The opposition’s concerns are not without merit. Transparency and public engagement should always be paramount in decisions of this scale, especially when new administrative divisions are being formed. Yet, this must be balanced with the need for timely implementation. The people of Negros have long sought the benefits that the NIR promises, and any delay—whether caused by legal hurdles or administrative backlogs—risks further stagnating progress in the region.
In the end, the Supreme Court will decide the fate of the NIR. But the longer this process takes, the more residents will continue to suffer from inefficiencies that the NIR was designed to address. While it is crucial to respect due process and the rule of law, there is an urgent need to find a resolution that serves the best interests of all stakeholders—ensuring that the people of Negros can finally benefit from the more effective governance they have long demanded.
If the court upholds the legality of the NIR, the next steps should include robust efforts to engage the public, providing more information about how the region’s creation will impact their lives and how it will enhance governance. In the meantime, the focus should be on moving forward swiftly while ensuring that no group feels left behind in the process.
